Musings about Clothing-Optional 2.0

We received a message on our YouTube channel today. Someone asked whether “it is okay to wear only boxers when visiting a naturist place“. We explained that it is not. In fact, that the only types of clothing that really are considered a big no-no are underwear and bathing suits. Well, visibly that is, if it’s freezing outside and you’re wearing pants and a jacket, feel free to wear some undies too. But only boxers? Nope.

 

This got us thinking. Why would someone want to walk around in only boxers? Interestingly, we have no issues at all being naked among other people at any venue that allows it, but the thought of wearing only underwear feels kinda awkward. We believe that we would feel more naked in underwear than if we were actually naked. Is that strange? Have we gotten too deep into naturism?

 

 

Sexy on the nude beach

We feel the same about thongs and tiny bikinis, by the way, which are not an uncommon sight on nude beaches. Those things won’t keep you warm nor will they protect you from anything. The only reasons that we can come up with are the shame of going full monty or to sexualize your body. When we did a bit of research about this, we stumbled upon the lingerie website Clovia, which claims that their thongs “enhance your sex appeal, self-confidence and make you feel super sexy“. That’s all very nice, but the nude beach isn’t really a place where you are expected to “feel super sexy”.

 

So we could conclude that the people who want to wear underwear in naturist places would either do so for the wrong reasons or out of shame. This element of shame is really interesting. Some people wear a thong because they’re ashamed to be completely naked. While we would be ashamed wearing nothing but a thong, and not when we’re completely naked. Where does that difference come from?

 

We believe that it’s in the power of habit. When we think back about our non-naturist days, we probably would have worn a plastic bag if it meant that we didn’t have to be naked. Only by spending more and more time without clothes in naturist environments, we learned to appreciate our bare skin more than any type of clothes (or plastic for that matter). But this has taken some time.

 

New Cambium intext 2
 

 

What’s practical?

Back in the day, there wasn’t really much of an in between. Either you were at a naturist place and expected to be totally naked, or you were at a non-naturist place and expected to be everything but totally naked. But the times are changing and the concept of clothing-optional has sneaked its way into naturism. Sometimes quite straightforward, in the sense of resorts calling themselves “clothing-optional”. Other times more gently, like at the French naturist campsites where dressing up for dinner seems to be more accepted than dining naked, even if it’s still 35°C.

 

It can also be the other way around. We, naturists, like to stand behind the slogan “nude when practical, clothed when necessary”, but who are we to define for someone else what is practical? Is 20°C still practical? How about 15°C? Or 5°C? We kid you not, we’ve seen naked people at 5°C. Kudos to them, but the day that they become the benchmark, we’re moving to a tropical place.

 

Which brings us back to shame. Shame is an extreme form of discomfort and discomfort is all but practical. So we could argue that feeling ashamed of your nudity would be a valid reason to wear clothes. But then how will you get rid of that shame?

 

 

Away with clothing-optional

Die-hard naturists will tell you that clothing-optional is the devil. Or at least that it’s good for absolutely nothing. It’s the nude way or the highway, just as it has been dictated at naturist venues for centuries. In a way, they are right. We took our first steps into social nudity in a nude spa where the rules were very strict: all clothes go off in the dressing room. Period. You are allowed to wear a bathrobe to walk between the facilities, but in the pool, jacuzzi, steam room, sauna, and whatever other warm and humid things they provide, you shall be naked.

 

It’s the trick with the band-aid on the hairy body part. Pulling it off slowly will only give you more opportunities to stop. While one hard pull may hurt like hell, at least it’ll be over quickly. Should we go back to the traditional naturist club where you put your clothes in a locker at the reception? Nudity is a pillar of naturism, so why not just ban clothes completely at naturist places?

 

This may sound like an ideal solution, but it has a big flaw. It makes the first steps into naturism much larger. We’ve talked to numerous people who visit nude beaches but are reluctant to go to a naturist resort. The main reason why is almost unanimous. They don’t want to feel pressured to be naked at times or in circumstances when they don’t feel like it.

 

Maestra Banner
 

 

What if the spa was clothing-optional?

We wonder if that nude spa, back in the day, had been a clothing-optional one, whether we would have gotten naked too. As this was our first time, and we had no idea what to expect, we would definitely have brought bathing suits. And we would have been wearing them when entering the spa.

 

If everyone else was naked, the awkward feeling of being the only bathing suit in the room would probably have drawn us over the line pretty quickly. We would have silently sneaked into a corner, quickly undress, and act as if we never wore clothes before.

 

If half was naked and half was clothed, we’d probably not get naked on the first visit. But we might have the second time (or maybe the 5th) because seeing those naked people enjoy the jacuzzi would tickle our curiosity to also want to experience this.

 

If more than let’s say 60% of the others were in bathing suits, we’re pretty certain that we would have kept ours on as well. Then the naked people would be a minority. They would be the strange ones. And that’s where the whole philosophy of clothing-optional falls apart.

 

 

The pink gym shorts

Over the years, we’ve learned to be comfortably naked in any given circumstance. But not everyone has the privilege of spending a significant amount of time at places where nudity is accepted. We’ve met people who have been going on naturist vacations for 20 years, and still find the first couple of minutes after the clothes go off a bit awkward. Being surrounded by naked people is an encouragement. If most others would be clothed, it would just increase the discomfort.

 

 
We’re a bit in a chicken or egg situation here. Giving people the chance to choose when to get naked and when not will definitely improve the odds that they’ll go to a naturist resort in the first place. But too many clothed people will only discourage others to get naked. We need to create a balance that is comfortable for everybody.

 

The question is “how?”. You can’t really ask visitors on arrival when exactly they plan to undress. Maybe we should allow guests to only wear clothes provided by the resort. Like when you forgot your sports clothes for gym class and had to wear oversized pink shorts with flowers. That’ll encourage them to get naked!

 

 

Clothing-optional 2.0

There is a better solution though, and one that is being applied a lot at large naturist campsites in France. Technically, they maintain a clothing-optional policy, but nudity is obligatory in and around the water facilities. In other words, if you want to do the cool stuff, you got to get naked. We were talking to the owners of such a resort one day, who employ students during the summer months. We asked them if any of the students were naturists. They replied: “Not yet, but wait until it gets 40°C“.

 

We believe that this is the way forward. We shouldn’t just start allowing clothes at naturist places in general, but neither should we keep enforcing nudity “when practical”. Instead, we should give people a reason to get naked. Thinking back about that day in the spa, we actually could have remained covered if we wanted to. We had the bathrobe. We could have just wandered around all day with our hands in our pockets. The reason why we didn’t, is because we wanted to get into the jacuzzi and the sauna. The reason why those students will eventually get naked is that one day or another, they won’t be able to resist the call from the pool.

 
Naked Wanderings Live Q&A

Support Naked Wanderings

Do you like what we do for naturism and naturists? Did we make you laugh or cry? Did we help you find the information you were looking for? Then definitely join our Patreon community!
 

Become a Patron!


 

47 thoughts on “Musings about Clothing-Optional 2.0”

  1. Nicely written article with balanced thoughts..
    I feel that Naturism is an individual’s choice & preferences.
    It can’t be framed with laws & regulations.. However, saying that, it won’t be a nice idea to roam around on a nude beach with innerwear. The purpose itself will get defeated. At a nude beach, the one has to be naked.
    Anyways, the opinions will continue to differ..

    Reply
  2. “Why would someone want to walk around in only boxers? ”

    Boxers are light, soft, shorts. The ones I prefer have a soft waistband rather than a tight elastic. I wear them around the house quite often, and would wear them outside my home in my yard, if my wife would let me. 🙂
    Now, I would not wear them to a store, or go to meet people in them, but in my house or in ‘my domain’ I find them very comfy. i.e. they are casual wear for around the house.

    Reply
    • Let’s rephrase that question: Why would someone want to walk around in only boxers in a venue where it’s okay to be naked and where most other people will be naked?

      Reply
  3. What you describe as clothing-optional 2.0 is what we’ve always known in the US. We hear there are a few nudity required resorts here but in our 10 years as nudists we’ve never been to one. All of the resorts we go to do have a nudity requirement in the pools and hot tubs, though. We did see an older woman get yelled at for trying to get into the pool at Lake Como with bikini bottoms. Apparently she had been told multiple times about the rules and kept ignoring them.

    Our home resort has signs that nudity is required within the fenced area around the pool, but it is only enforced in the pool itself. I’ve seen plenty of men and women in pareos or shorts at social events by the pool, but none who tried going in the pool while wearing anything.

    Reply
  4. > French naturist campsites where dressing up for dinner seems to be more accepted than dining naked, even if it’s still 35°C

    That would be very frustrating. If I’m at a nudist resort I want to feel free from silly norms that dictate what you can wear depending on the location or time of day or whatever. These rules are mostly illogical and I want to feel free. My body, my rules. I can wear clothes the rest of the year, I don’t want to dress up for dinner unless it’s really cold.

    Reply
  5. Great post. Well written and well reasoned. Had I been asked whether it’s ok to wear only boxer shorts at a nudist venue, I would probably have replied, “Not unless you want to look like a doofus.” But your response was better and definitely more polite.

    RR

    Reply
  6. Parece lo mas lógico estar desnudo en un lugar nudista, por algo muy fácil de entender se llama nudista, para otras opciones: otros lugares.
    Julio

    Reply
  7. Someone once put it on Reddit that wearing clothes at a naturist resort is “Like going to a golf course and never actually playing golf”!

    What you’ve left out is a fact which I’ve certainly observed, that at the resorts and beaches, it’s much more likely women than men who’ll want to keep clothes on. A clothing-optional policy may encourage women to come in the door, but I wonder if it leads to a situation that you described, where clothed people discourage new arrivals from undressing. But it’s entirely possible that this doesn’t affect everyone the same, and the men are encouraged by the naked men, while women are discouraged by the clothed women. I don’t want anyone to feel compelled, but I really do see nudity as better than clothes, and I’d like to be in an environment where people who choose to be there will choose to be naked.

    A lot of this was very well described in Stephane Deschenes’ article from a few years ago, “The sarong, destroyer of naturist worlds”. I’d be interested to hear if you agree with that, or if you think he took the idea too far.

    Reply
    • Great argument from you and Nick and Lins.
      I have never been to a nudist resort or anywhere socially nude than the gym.
      #somedaymaybe

      Reply
    • We like the golf comparison, but we don’t think that it’s always true. It depends a lot on what the visitor expects. We’d rather day that it’s like going to a golf course and never leaving the driving range. For the avid golfer, it might seem ridiculous that you don’t try to put some holes. But some people just love to shoot balls in a distance and nothing else. Just like some people just like to be nude at the beach or in the pool and nothing else.

      In the past, we’ve had quite lengthy discussions with Stéphane about his sarong quote, and from those we learned that this is also something very location dependent. As Europeans, we are used to going to France and Spain, where there are plenty resorts and something for everybody. In Canada, the resorts are fewer, so the resort owners need to be more considerate about the direction they want their resort to go. Both from an ideological point of view as from a commercial one.

      Reply
      • But your golf analogy leaves out the part where if too many people are “using the driving range” it discourages other people from “playing golf”. I think an important part of nude resorts is the expectation that you be nude because everyone has the same expectation and it provides a “when in Rome”, don’t be the odd one out motivation.
        There are very few places (in the USA) where people are allowed to be socially nude. If you want wear clothes, there are a zillion choices; go there.

        Reply
    • I disagree with this quote. I don’t know, maybe that is because I don’t go to “resorts” but only public beaches.

      When you go to the beach, the place is interesting in itself. Whether you get naked or not is a simple detail.

      Because you know, in some places, and this is the case for the island I’m talking about, people actually believe that nudity is a natural thing, and as such it’s not a big deal. You don’t go to a nudist place, you go to an interesting place, which you happen to enjoy naked if the weather permits, among other people who may or may not be naked, but who cares.

      Reply
  8. Another thoughtful article.

    Something very significant that I’ve noticed at clubs and resorts we’ve visited is the strong tendency that many people have, in general, to get naked around water, but they are often less inclined elsewhere. Although such people aren’t the same kind of naturist as I am (ie, the kind that would happily be naked 24/7), I still consider them to be naturists, and I think they should be welcomed.

    But if someone (not a novice) is ultimately uncomfortable with being naked at the pool or on the beach, I agree that – as the article seems to conclude – they are either missing the point, are in the wrong place, or doing it for completely the wrong reasons. So they need to filtered out. They are not naturists.

    I am all for Clothing Optional 2.0 if it means allowing people to be whatever they want to be, or what they are comfortable with. If some people choose to dress at certain times or in certain places, I really don’t mind – as long as they don’t mind my nakedness.

    I have come to realise and accept that no two naturists are the same; it’s a broad spectrum, so trying to make rules or force genuine naturists to conform to one specific idea or ideal only discourages people.

    There would be millions more practising naturists in the world if there was less pressure for would-be naturists to conform to what existing naturists define as ‘normal’ or ‘standard’.

    Reply
    • Doubtful. The main pressure is from non-nudists to conform to their no nudity standard. Until this changes the numbers will not go up by the orders of magnitude you suggest.

      Reply
  9. Interesting thoughts. All I can say is thank God I live in New Zealand, where the only naturist places are the clubs and one resort. Most naturists expect society to regard nakedness as acceptable – at least in appropriate locations such as beaches and other public outback spaces. For the naturist world to enforce nudity amounts to hypocrisy when trying to preach to the textile world to stop enforcing clothing!

    I will not go anywhere that nudity is enforced! I am the sole owner of my body and it’s my choice as to what pieces of cloth I choose to hang on it! I love being naked much of the time – but it’s also fun to dress up sometimes. I get tired of naturists bleating on and on about how much they hate clothing and criticising others who like to show off a bit of fashion now and then. Fortunately we don’t have any “nude beaches” here, and it will be a very sad day if our government decides to declare any beaches as “official nude beaches”. So I get to enjoy the best of both worlds – I can go naked on any beach if I wish, or I can wear a pair of colourful, trendy satin boxers if I choose to. And nobody cares!

    Reply
  10. The worst (most awkward) is when the staff is not nude. Fully clothed teenagers walking around the pool soliciting drink orders. Will never go there again. Ponderosa Ontario Canada.

    Reply
    • Why do you find it most awkward if staff is dressed? It is normal and even beneficial that staff is recognizable. How else would one know who to order a drink from or ask for assistance if you would encounter a problem?
      Are you afraid that their clothed presence will trigger visitors to dress up and turn the place into a textile place? If not, then what’s the issue?

      Reply
      • Good point, it would be very hard to recognise staff when they’re all naked and this would probably lead to some awkward situations.

        Reply
    • It’s very hard for resorts to find qualified staff. It’s even much harder to find qualified staff that is also a naturist. We don’t know much about Ponderosa, but there are resorts in France that employ hundreds of staff members during the high season. If they need to look for naturists only, you’ll probably have to pour your own drinks.

      Reply
  11. How about a dressed time limit? If, after three hours, they are still bashful, then they are invited to leave and try again another time.

    Reply
    • Not a bad idea, but the time one needs to become comfortable is very personal. Some need less than a minute, others need more than a week.

      Reply
  12. Greetings from France! Unfortunately in France there are no clothing optional places. And this is a big problem for us as a couple since my wife is hesitant. Fortunately we managed to visit some other places like Spain where nudity is optional and both textile and nude people can stay together as it should be. And finally my wife made her first step and tried this wonderful feeling! However she is still skeptical about nudism.

    Actually this will be a question from my side, do you have any suggestion about how to approach her? This is very sensitive moments for me and I don’t want to ruin this exciting possibility of having our lifestyle in common or at least accommodate each other.

    Thank you very much for your posts. I benefit a lot from your ideas and suggestions of beautiful places. I am glad to know you! 🙂

    Reply
    • I think you are doing the right thing, allowing her to accept you as you are as you accept her as she is. Then with gentle optional experiences and letting her open up if she chooses in her own time.
      I’m doing this with my partner who is more hesitant, and it’s great.

      Just a bit worried if there are more dictator-y places now!

      I like the name that someone said in another comment ‘nudity normal’, though doesn’t mean you have to be ‘normal’ and be nude 🙂

      Reply
    • Actually, many places in France are clothing optional even though they call themselves naturist. Only the water facilities will always be nude only. But go to any of the larger resorts in France, and your wife will always be allowed to cover up (although bathing suits are frowned upon).

      When it comes to tips: Just give her all the time she needs.

      Reply
  13. It is interesting that you make such a big deal about nudity. I have come to believe that the “hardcore” nudists are those that consider nudity the less natural.

    I can talk about my local beach here in contrast with what you describe here. Nudity is really a natural thing here. That is, there is no rule about nudity, it is fully accepted and nobody talks it. You want to get naked? Fine, do it. You want to keep some clothes on for whatever reason? That’s fine too. Nobody will tell you how you have to dress, you decide. There is no nudists or textiles here.

    Wearing sunglasses on a sunny day does not make me a sunglassist. Keeping some clothes at the beach does not make me a textile. Not keeping any clothe on does not make me a nudist. Nudity at the beach is a natural thing. I’m neither a nudist nor a textile.

    Reply
    • That is a beautiful example, and we very much agree that the ones who have the loudest mouth about naturism are often those that still believe that nudidy is not normal and needs some kind of abnormal protection.

      Reply
  14. An interesting article and discussion to follow it, a couple of ideas.
    1 The naturist resorts I have run have both been CO, but we chose to describe them as “nudity normal” to highlight the expectation that people would get bare.
    2 Clothed at clubs, when people get in touch about visits, ask – Are you planning to go naked from arrival? – and limit the number of no’s and maybe’s on a given day to prevent textile overload.
    I loved the idea of the Resort Supplied clothing only …

    Reply
    • You’re absolutely right about personal conversations. We’ve been saying this so much to naturist resorts: Listen to the stories of the wannabee visitors. 99.9% of the time you can filter out the rotten apples within 5 minutes. But that’s easy for small resorts… A Euronat who gets thousands of visitors a day just doesn’t have the resources for that.

      Reply
  15. I am a naturist, I was looking forward to visiting some naturist resorts this year.

    However, after this article, has suddenly put me off. I guess it’s not too late to rebook!

    I am so looking forward to be naturist in the holiday, I have been reassuring my partner, that he is ok clothed or unclothed. I think once he is there, he will soon be unclothed, but that is his pace to take. I would not want people judging him, like this article would seem to.

    If I want to take my time to become comfortable with new people, I want to too. I probably do not need it this days, but…..

    I understand that it can feel awkward for some people if most people are clothed, but I have been on naturist holidays in the UK, and there is a mix, due to the weather, and everything has been just fine. Even when most people were clothed as it was so cold.

    What I really valued at these events was an acceptance of everyone clothed and unclothed it was wonderful. I could be free to be unclothed or unclothed as I chose (well as the weather allowed really, but still). It made my non-naturist partner feel comfortable in joining in. It was wonderful.

    This article is not accepting. It seems judgemental would you say? It’s understandable the perspective, when our naturism has been judged by many textiles. Totally understanding .And very tempting to go down the same track. But to suggest it’s just shame why people do not go naturist, seems quite narrow viewed. It can be way more complex than that. It can even just go down to whatever you are comfortable with in that moment, it does not have to be due to shame.

    Where it is due to shame, is it an opportunity to be shame free. And encouragement like these resorts or beaches and events seems wonderful to me. I almost wish that I could have everyone I know experience this, but I cannot force this, I have to accept that they are them, I am me.

    While no one wore just boxers, including my partner, I would say feel free to be yourself. I come to this way of life for the freedom. I’m not one of those people that judge people for going out in their pyjamas. ‘You be you’ I say, our social norms like that were created by us anyway.

    Therefore this article, as a naturist is ‘Not in my name’

    Is this article just going down the same track of mistakes as textiles? My way or the highway?

    And I want to go on a naturist holiday, do I have to holiday away from my partner now, just in case he wants to be clothed? Or do I take the chance, which is likely, that he will join in when he feels happy to.

    Reply
  16. Nudists should also be able to explain why they want to omit that last piece of fabric as well. It is clearly about body parts that are attributed to sexuality. They are widely regarded as impossible to show, indecent and too private. We should also think about our attitude towards these body parts and the taboos associated with them. They are not only associated with sexuality but also with excretions and reproduction. For all three complexes, almost all of us have a problem talking about them loosely. Doesn’t it actually have to do with the fact that we are open to the fact that we are people who can retire, feel sexual desire, father children, give birth and breastfeed. To see it openly can mean that we acknowledge being part of the nature that all this belongs to. Apparently we all have a hard time with that.

    Reply
  17. In this discussion there are a lot of misconceptions.

    The biggest one is that nudity is « normal » amongst Homo sapiens. I disagree with you guys when you say that. Nudity amongst the more than 10 billion humans on this earth is NOR natural, NOR normal… only a few million humans practice social nudity, that’s it, and these that do are mainly westerners that went through a disinhibition process to get there.
    Even the most remote primary tribes very seldom do go really and totally nude, there is always some sort of bodily decoration.
    The reason of clothing is profoundly embedded in human subconscience and has many reasons: mainly protection towards nature, other possible agressions and difference towards the other humans for social status.

    By going naked a person is actually putting itself in a more fragile situation…. A person needs self confidence to disrobe in a social environment…
    and when doing so for the first time a feeling of danger deeply rooted inside the mind emerges.

    This is the reason why teenagers and women tend to have more difficulties to get nude in public.

    On the other side, you can also understand why this feeling of public nudity is actually so freeing: by getting naked in public, you free yourself of this deeply enrooted fear that something might happen when your naked…. And when it doesn’t, you feel freed (and this has actually nothing to do with religion, it is much older than christianity…).

    But not everybody is equal towards this process to go through to get confortable nude in public…. And it gets more and more difficult if the crowd is increasingly clothed.

    This is the biggest paradox for newbees: they don’t want to be « forced » in it, but perfectly well understand that being nude in a 100% nude environment (e.g. a nude spa) is much easier.

    This is the point where Naturism has invented the social dimension of the thing: by going naked in a joint naked environment, you enhance your self respect, self confidence AND that of the others… but it functions only if the crowd is mainly nude, and does NOT function well in a (too) mixed bunch.
    A bodyconscious shy 14 year old teenage girl will never get naked alone amongst a bunch of 18 year old guys in shorts…
    And this even if she wanted to… the guys in shorts will only increase her inhibitions instead of the contrary if they were naked….

    So, again, in a nutshell: a real naturist understands that in a naturist environment, he not only has the right to be naked, but he also has the responsibility to be naked to help the others to fight their possible inhibitions.

    Older naturists in the practice tend to forget what it was to be shy and bashful…..

    Reply
    • You’re right that there probably has never been a time when nudity was the norm, not in the west nor in other cultures. But the acceptance of nudity tends to fluctuate. Back in times of the Greek Empire, sports were by default practised nude (by men). The Romans had a communal bathing culture. And even more recently, in the late 60 there was a huge uprise of topless sunbathing, which then again disappeared in the early 21st century.

      We also agree that the “acceptance process” is different for everybody. We’ve met first time naturists who couldn’t care less if there were clothed people around, and long term naturists who still feel uncomfortable if someone is clothed. We don’t think that clothing-optional is the one way forward, there will always be a need for nude obligatory places, but for those who are comfortable naked among the clothed, clothing-optional is a great alternative.

      Reply
    • > The biggest one is that nudity is « normal » amongst Homo sapiens. I disagree with you guys when you say that. Nudity amongst the more than 10 billion humans on this earth is NOR natural, NOR normal… only a few million humans practice social nudity, that’s it, and these that do are mainly westerners that went through a disinhibition process to get there.

      I’ve recently read an interesting article “The great cover-up: Is FKK dying out?” in exberliner (can easily be find in the internet), and while I didn’t live in DDR, if this article is to be believed, nudity was just as frequent on most of its beaches as it is on modern french naturist resorts, if not more, and nobody made a big deal of it.

      > The reason of clothing is profoundly embedded in human subconscience

      I don’t think there is such a thing as “human subconscience”.
      Of course in some / a lot of scenarios, people physically need clothing as a protection from nature. But other than that, clothing is purely social, just like a lot of other things are. Every society has its own norms / customs / logic of clothing; it’s just that in almost all societies in the present day, except for, as you say, “the most remote primary tribes”, social norms are heavily influenced by colonial past or neocolonial present (just as homophobia, which is often said to be profoundly embedded in human subconsciousness, yet can easily be traced to european puritanism enforced on half the world with blood and sword).

      Reply
      • Indeed, clothing (the way we use it today) is definitely something social. But it has become so social that we don’t even think about it. When most people put on clothes in the morning, they don’t consider the option of not wearing clothes. Even if they don’t have to go anywhere and there’s a heatwave going on. That’s what we meant by human subconscience.

        Reply
        • I think the user Didge was the one who mentioned “human subconscience”, not you? 🙂

          It is interesting though that what you say is literally what other people say about all the other kinds of normativity in our society!
          Like, how most people don’t consider the option of being attracted to someone not of the opposite gender, or of not being the gender they were assigned at birth. (Which often results in people only figuring these kinds of things much later in life, after spending decades in an unhappy marriage or trying to fit in as someone they are not, and thinking that everybody else must feel the same about their lives).

          So I guess this might be called textilenormativity, similar to heteronormativity or cisnormativity or amatonormativity or any of the other things imposed on everybody by the (usually Western, directly or indirectly) society.

          Reply
  18. This is a great post on a really complicated topic!

    Another thing that bothers me with a lot of clothing-optional places and even some places that call themselves naturist is that they require clothing in certain settings (stores, restaurants etc). And naturally this has an adverse effect on nudity in other settings as well: if one has to be clothed in the grocery store, then they’ll presumably have to put clothes on before going outside (it would be awkward to carry a bundle of clothes in hands just to put them on right at the grocery store entrance), which means that a higher percentage of people outside will be clothed just because they’re on their way to or from a store/restaurant, which can create this feedback loop by making it less comfortable for some other people to be naked when so many around are clothed.
    Mandatory nudity in pools nudges more people to be nude, even those who were not going to go to the pool right now; but just like that, mandatory clothing in stores and restaurants nudges more people to be clothed.

    Also I don’t think there is a similarity between how ordinary places mandate clothing and how some naturist places mandate nudity. I’m all for the free choice, and in an utopian future society I’d imagine a lot of places being clothing optional without it being a big deal for anybody, and with people not bothered by others around them being clothed, and deciding whether to undress based on their own feelings, not on whether those around them wear anything or not.
    However we’re long way away from such a society, and in our society, the default enforced norm is that nudity is sinful. So I think that naturist places explicitly saying that this norm is not welcome there is not the same as all the other places in the world enforcing this norm. Even “you don’t need to be clothed” and “you must be clothed at all times” are sadly not on equal footing, with the latter being much more powerful and the former being marginalized.
    I think it’s like with gay bars. Ideally, we wouldn’t have any gay bars or pride events, because people’s sexuality would not be a big deal, because nobody would care who is straight and who is gay, because the notions of hetero- and homosexuality themselves were seen as absurd (as they are). But we live in a world with compulsory heteronormativity, and it makes perfect sense that not only the gay community tries to carve at least some places to themselves, but that also, while nobody (hopefully) is going to kick out a straight couple out of a gay bar, nobody will also go an extra mile to make straight couples welcome there, otherwise it turns from gay bar to just yet another bar where gay couples are also welcome. Just like I heard stories about major technically naturist resorts where, in high season, a nude person can be a rare sight, meaning that only die-hard naturist who do not care about “reading the room” at all (and after all we’re all social creatures) will feel somewhat comfortable being nude in such a setting…
    In theory, yes, clothing optional or “we don’t see gender or couple (or polycule) gender composition or transness” places could be great. But in practice, with all the preexisting norms spread through the entire society, it’s yet another “when you don’t see color, you cannot see patterns” situation. As much as I hate rules, I think that “nudity is mandatory throughout the entire property, weather permitting”, at least in some of the naturist places, is a necessary / lesser evil.

    Reply
    • The rules about mandatory clothing in shops and restaurants of naturist resorts has also baffled us and we can’t think of a valid reason for them to exist. Some will say hygiene, but when it’s very hot outside, we dare to bet that your body will be more hygienic than your clothes. Most resort owners tell us that this is a way to make the step towards naturism smaller. Which is right, we’ve met lots of people who go to nude beaches but are reluctant to visit resorts because they are afraid of being forced to be naked all the time. It’s just that it doesn’t make much sense in this case, because the solution is to make those places (shop, restaurant,…) clothing optional. We don’t mind if someone wants to put on pants to go to the shop. What we do mind is that we need to go back to our accommodation to find pants before we can go to the shop.

      We’ve made the comparison with gay bars as well and we’ve talked about this with our gay friends. Some of them love going to gay bars, others don’t like it and prefer to go to bars where there is a mix. We think that it’s the same for naturism. Some will always keep going to the nude obligatory places, while others don’t mind mingling with textiles.

      Reply
      • As a gay person, I’m also perfectly fine with mixed places (and a lot of queer people are in queer relationships that might seem straight-passing; I’d probably be uncomfortable at a gay bar that kicks out people based on how they look like).

        On the other side, if I want to go to a gay bar, I don’t want to end up in a place that’s technically gay friendly, but we’re going to be the only gay people there (and this happened!)

        It’s a difficult line to walk, made difficult by society that considers homosexuality or naturism as something “other” that should be excluded from the public spaces to the separate (often much worse) segregated space… so it’s natural (no pun intended) that people who are forced into these segregated places want to make them their own, rather than feeling to be excluded from there too, by the crowds of people who have the entire world at their disposal.

        Reply
        • That’s very true. But by creating segregated places, you’re stimulating the “us and them” feeling. We very much believe that naturist only places need to keep existing, just like we believe that textile only places will always be needed. But we also think that there’s space in between for people who don’t really care. These spaces might improve the integration of minorities.

          Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.